Business-purpose finance · Australia-wide enquiries
back to top
Secure online commercial property settlement in Australia
28 Jun
Australian development finance guide

Property Development Loans Australia: From Site Acquisition to Project Exit

Property development finance must fund a sequence, not just a property. A credible request connects the approved project, valuation, total development cost, borrower equity, builder, drawdowns, presales and repayment exit into one fully reconciled capital plan.

Commercial and business-purpose finance only. Subject to lender assessment, valuation, quantity-surveyor review, planning and building documentation, acceptable security, borrower equity, presales where required and a credible exit strategy.

A headline loan amount does not show whether a project is financeable. The lender needs to know what has already been spent, what remains to be paid, when each cost falls due and how the completed debt will be repaid.

What is a property development loan?

A property development loan is commercial finance used for one or more stages of acquiring, approving, constructing, completing or exiting a development project. The facility is commonly secured by the development site and may also involve guarantees, additional property or broader business security.

Unlike a standard completed-property loan, development finance changes as the project progresses. The lender may initially fund a land refinance or acquisition, then advance construction funds in verified stages. Interest and approved costs may be paid monthly, capitalised or retained from the facility, depending on the structure.

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority describes land acquisition, development and construction exposures as finance where the security predominantly relates to acquiring land for development or developing and constructing residential or commercial property. This distinction reflects the additional risks created by approvals, construction, cost movement and the future sales or refinance exit.

Central question: will verified debt and equity be sufficient to reach the next financeable milestone and repay the lender under a realistic base case?

Development finance can change at every stage

Site acquisition

Funding may assist with purchasing an eligible development site, subject to valuation, deposit, planning position, intended use and settlement requirements.

Planning and pre-construction

A land or pre-development facility may support an approved commercial purpose while permits, design, consultant reports, presales and building documentation progress.

Construction

A construction facility usually advances progressively against completed work, verified costs and continuing compliance with the lender’s approved budget.

Completion and exit

At completion, construction debt may be repaid through settlements, residual-stock finance, investment refinance or another documented exit.

A facility designed for one stage may not automatically fund the next. A land lender may not provide construction debt; construction terms may lapse if approvals, valuation, presales or costs change; and a completed-project refinance requires a fresh assessment.

What property development lenders may assess

The site and approval

Title, tenure, location, zoning, permit conditions, easements, contamination, access, services, proposed product and remaining approval risk.

The developer

Relevant project experience, financial position, past delivery, professional team, governance and capacity to manage delays and cost pressure.

The builder

Licence, experience, financial capacity, contract form, price, program, current workload, insurance and relationship with the developer.

The market

Demand, comparable sales, achievable selling prices, buyer depth, competing supply, rental evidence and the expected selling period.

The numbers

Independent valuation, gross realisation value, total development cost, debt, equity, contingency, interest, fees and sensitivity analysis.

The exit

Qualifying presales, unsold-stock strategy, settlement timing, investment refinance, release prices and downside repayment options.

Lender requirements vary by institution, project type and risk. A private or non-bank lender may approach presales, experience or documentation differently from a bank, but the project still requires transparent costs, adequate capital and a credible repayment pathway.

A financeable feasibility must reconcile every dollar

The development feasibility is both an investment model and a funding schedule. It should identify the full uses of funds and the confirmed sources available to meet them.

Potential uses of funds

Land and acquisition costs; duties and settlement costs; design and consultants; authority contributions; demolition and remediation; building contract; civil and external works; contingency; marketing; selling costs; finance costs; rates, tax, insurance and other holding costs.

Potential sources of funds

Borrower cash equity; verified land equity accepted by the lender; senior debt; approved mezzanine or preferred-equity capital; presale deposits where accessible and permitted; and documented project receipts.

APRA guidance distinguishes hard costs associated with physical development from soft costs such as professional and regulatory expenses. A lender’s definition of qualifying costs may not match the developer’s accounting categories. Items excluded from the lender’s approved cost base still have to be funded.

Funding-gap test: verified sources of funds minus every remaining project use must stay at or above zero through the full drawdown program, including interest, contingency and exit costs.

Contingency is not optional working capital

Contingency exists to absorb defined project risk. Using it early for known costs can leave no buffer for latent conditions, authority changes, price movements, defects or delay. A lender may require the borrower to fund an overrun before further debt is advanced.

Valuation, GRV, cost and debt answer different questions

An independent valuation may include the site’s current value, value on completion and an adopted gross realisation value based on the expected sale of individual lots, units or completed assets. The lender may use conservative assumptions or different values from the developer’s feasibility.

Current site value

The value of the property in its present condition, considering title, approval status and existing improvements.

Gross realisation value

The aggregate adopted selling value of the completed project before selling, marketing, holding, finance and other deductions.

Total development cost

The full cost required to acquire, approve, construct, complete, sell and finance the project under the adopted assumptions.

Net realisation and profit

Expected sale proceeds after relevant selling costs and project expenses. A lender may test profit margin and downside resilience.

Common lending metrics compare debt with value, cost and presales. Their definitions can differ: debt may include undrawn commitments, retained interest and fees, while the accepted cost base may exclude some expenses. Never assume that a headline LVR alone establishes available funding.

Hypothetical sensitivity test

A developer models the project using the valuer’s adopted sale schedule and the quantity surveyor’s cost plan. The lender then tests lower selling prices, delayed settlements, higher costs and extra interest. If the debt cannot be repaid in that downside case, the project may need more equity, lower debt, stronger presales or a revised scope.

Hypothetical example only. It is not a completed transaction, offer, approval or indication of available terms.

Borrower equity must be real, available and correctly timed

Borrower equity can include cash already invested, additional cash available at settlement or value in the development site that the lender accepts. A historical purchase price or claimed uplift is not automatically treated as current usable equity.

APRA’s commercial property guidance emphasises sufficient hard equity from project sponsors and warns against relying on mezzanine or valuation uplift as a substitute. Private-lender structures can differ, but every layer of capital still affects total debt, ranking, intercreditor rights, cost and repayment risk.

Senior development debt

Usually the first-ranking facility funding approved project costs in accordance with conditions and drawdown controls.

Mezzanine finance

Subordinated capital sitting behind senior debt. It may increase available funding but adds cost, consent and priority complexity.

Preferred equity

Investment capital with negotiated return and control rights. Legal and accounting treatment depends on the documents.

Developer equity

Capital genuinely at risk from the sponsor, including acceptable cash and verified land equity.

The sources-and-uses statement should show when each equity contribution is paid. Some lenders require equity to be contributed before or alongside debt rather than held for later stages.

Presales are assessed for quality, not just face value

Presales may demonstrate market demand and create a defined settlement exit, but a signed contract is not automatically a qualifying presale. A lender may review purchaser identity, deposit evidence, contract conditions, sunset dates, valuation, concentration and whether contracts are at arm’s length.

APRA’s practice guidance describes prudent bank policies as considering legally binding contracts, arm’s-length transactions, minimum non-refundable deposits and sunset dates consistent with expected completion. It also highlights concentration to a single purchaser or buyer group.

  • reconcile every contract to the correct lot, purchaser, price and deposit;
  • identify related-party, investor, foreign-buyer and bulk-purchase concentration;
  • check finance, due-diligence, nomination and rescission conditions;
  • compare contract sunset dates with the construction program;
  • model valuation shortfalls and purchaser settlement failure;
  • confirm lender release prices for each settlement; and
  • maintain an exit plan for unsold or unsettled stock.

Projects without full presales may still be considered by some lenders, subject to stronger equity, lower leverage, experienced sponsorship, market evidence and an acceptable alternative exit. No-presale construction finance should not be presented as automatic or universally available.

Drawdowns depend on verified progress and remaining cost

A construction facility is commonly advanced in stages rather than as unrestricted cash at settlement. Before each drawdown, the lender or quantity surveyor may compare completed work, approved variations, payments, remaining facility funds and the cost still required to finish.

Builder contract

The contract scope, price, exclusions, provisional sums, program, variations, security and termination rights affect funding risk.

Quantity surveyor

An independent QS may review the initial cost plan, progress claims, variation status, contingency and cost to complete.

Progress evidence

Invoices, certificates, site inspections, statutory declarations, permits and updated program information may be required.

Balancing the facility

Remaining undrawn debt plus committed equity must continue to cover the lender-accepted cost to complete and approved finance costs.

Cost overruns, builder failure, unapproved variations or depleted contingency can stop further advances until the shortfall is resolved. The earlier the revised budget is prepared, the more options may remain.

The exit must work before the loan begins

Development finance is normally repaid through completed-property settlements, refinance of retained assets, residual-stock finance, sale of the development site or another evidenced source. The timing of the exit must match facility maturity and allow for construction delay, titles, occupancy approvals and settlement periods.

Sale exit

Test presale settlement dates, unsold-stock absorption, release prices, selling costs, settlement failure and the order in which debt is repaid.

Refinance exit

Test completed value, stabilised income, lease-up, serviceability, refinance costs and whether the intended long-term lender’s criteria can be met.

APRA has highlighted refinancing risk in commercial property lending. A proposed refinance is not a reliable exit merely because the completed asset should be worth more. The future lender must still accept the valuation, income, borrower, gearing, documentation and market conditions at that time.

Downside planning

Stress test lower prices, slower sales, buyer defaults, construction delay, builder replacement, higher interest, cost overruns and valuation movement. The plan should identify who contributes additional capital and how the project can reach a saleable or refinanceable state.

How to prepare a property development finance request

1

Define the project stage

State whether the requirement is for acquisition, land refinance, pre-development, construction, completion or exit.

2

Present the approved scheme

Provide title, planning permit, endorsed plans, building documentation, consultant reports and unresolved conditions.

3

Reconcile the feasibility

Show total costs, expenditure to date, current debt, remaining costs, contingency, finance costs and required net funding.

4

Evidence value and sales

Provide the valuation, sale schedule, comparable evidence, leases and complete presale information where relevant.

5

Document delivery capability

Include developer experience, builder information, contract, quantity-surveyor material, program and project team.

6

Confirm equity and exit

Evidence every capital source, timing, security position and the base-case and downside repayment pathways.

Documents commonly requested

  • borrower, guarantor, trust and project-entity details;
  • title, contract of sale and existing loan payout;
  • planning permit, endorsed plans and approval schedule;
  • building contract, program, builder licence and insurance;
  • detailed feasibility and sources-and-uses statement;
  • independent valuation and quantity-surveyor reports;
  • costs paid to date and evidence of borrower equity;
  • presale contracts, purchaser schedule and deposit evidence;
  • developer experience and completed-project schedule;
  • financial information requested by the lender; and
  • documented sale, refinance or alternative exit strategy.

Documentation varies by lender and transaction. A streamlined commercial process still requires enough reliable information for the lender to understand the project and security.

Continue the development-finance cluster

Property development loan questions

Can development finance cover both land and construction?

Potentially. Some facilities cover acquisition and construction, while others require a separate land or pre-development loan followed by a construction refinance. Approval, value, costs, equity and timing must be assessed.

Are presales always required for a property development loan?

No universal rule applies. Requirements vary by lender, project, leverage, developer experience, market and exit. Some lenders may consider projects without full presales where other risk protections are acceptable.

How are construction funds released?

Funds are commonly advanced through progressive drawdowns after review of completed work, the progress claim, quantity-surveyor reporting, remaining facility funds and the accepted cost to complete.

Can land equity count as the developer’s contribution?

Potentially. The lender will determine the accepted current value, existing debt and how much land equity it recognises. A claimed valuation uplift is not automatically usable equity.

What happens if the development runs over budget?

The lender may require additional borrower equity, revised QS material, scope changes or a new finance structure before further advances. Cost overruns should be disclosed and quantified early.

How is a development loan normally repaid?

Common exits include presale and completed-stock settlements, investment refinance, residual-stock finance or sale of the project. The proposed exit remains subject to timing, value and future lender or buyer performance.

Official Australian resources

Do you have a property development finance requirement?

Provide the project stage, approvals, feasibility, valuation, total costs, existing debt, equity, builder, presales, required net funding and proposed exit. Basic Finance Loans can discuss potential commercial pathways, subject to lender assessment.

Discuss your development

General information only. This article is not legal, planning, construction, tax, valuation, credit or financial advice. Seek appropriate independent advice before proceeding.


Business and eligible corporate investment finance. We do not provide regulated consumer credit. Eligible corporate-borrower investment scenarios may be considered, including short-term rural and lifestyle property finance where the corporate borrower is on title. Borrower structure, purpose, security and applicable legal requirements are assessed case by case. All applications are subject to lender assessment and approval. Read our lending policy